<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Tech bosses press G20 to build data centers, but split on risk	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.economylens.com/tech-bosses-press-g20-to-build-data-centers-but-split-on-risk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.economylens.com/tech-bosses-press-g20-to-build-data-centers-but-split-on-risk/</link>
	<description>Global Economy, Business and Market News, Tech Updates and Expert Analysis only on EconomyLens.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 11:16:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Rita Booke		</title>
		<link>https://www.economylens.com/tech-bosses-press-g20-to-build-data-centers-but-split-on-risk/#comment-35776</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rita Booke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 05:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.economylens.com/tech-bosses-press-g20-to-build-data-centers-but-split-on-risk/#comment-35776</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.economylens.com/tech-bosses-press-g20-to-build-data-centers-but-split-on-risk/#comment-35774&quot;&gt;Dusty_O&#039;Kon&lt;/a&gt;.

Both of you are kind of right, but also kind of talking past the electricity bill monster. If these data centers are going up, then regulators should absolutely hammer them on local power pricing, water use, and tax treatment. Otherwise it&#039;s just a giant subsidy with a fancier logo and a lot more GPUs.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.economylens.com/tech-bosses-press-g20-to-build-data-centers-but-split-on-risk/#comment-35774">Dusty_O&#8217;Kon</a>.</p>
<p>Both of you are kind of right, but also kind of talking past the electricity bill monster. If these data centers are going up, then regulators should absolutely hammer them on local power pricing, water use, and tax treatment. Otherwise it&#8217;s just a giant subsidy with a fancier logo and a lot more GPUs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dusty_O'Kon		</title>
		<link>https://www.economylens.com/tech-bosses-press-g20-to-build-data-centers-but-split-on-risk/#comment-35774</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dusty_O'Kon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 04:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.economylens.com/tech-bosses-press-g20-to-build-data-centers-but-split-on-risk/#comment-35774</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.economylens.com/tech-bosses-press-g20-to-build-data-centers-but-split-on-risk/#comment-35772&quot;&gt;Helen Back&lt;/a&gt;.

Sure, but that&#039;s exactly the problem: every time they say &#039;infrastructure,&#039; somehow it becomes a private monopoly with public risk. We already did this with broadband, power, and cloud—citizens get the grid strain, shareholders get the upside. Calling it inevitable doesn&#039;t make the bargaining power disappear.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.economylens.com/tech-bosses-press-g20-to-build-data-centers-but-split-on-risk/#comment-35772">Helen Back</a>.</p>
<p>Sure, but that&#8217;s exactly the problem: every time they say &#8216;infrastructure,&#8217; somehow it becomes a private monopoly with public risk. We already did this with broadband, power, and cloud—citizens get the grid strain, shareholders get the upside. Calling it inevitable doesn&#8217;t make the bargaining power disappear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Helen Back		</title>
		<link>https://www.economylens.com/tech-bosses-press-g20-to-build-data-centers-but-split-on-risk/#comment-35772</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Helen Back]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 23:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.economylens.com/tech-bosses-press-g20-to-build-data-centers-but-split-on-risk/#comment-35772</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.economylens.com/tech-bosses-press-g20-to-build-data-centers-but-split-on-risk/#comment-35770&quot;&gt;source_please&lt;/a&gt;.

I get the skepticism, but I think you&#039;re underselling the infrastructure angle a bit. If AI really does become a general-purpose layer like the internet, then countries that wait for perfect consensus may just end up paying rent forever to whoever built first. The real policy question is whether governments can force the profits and the costs to be shared more fairly, not whether the tech exists.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.economylens.com/tech-bosses-press-g20-to-build-data-centers-but-split-on-risk/#comment-35770">source_please</a>.</p>
<p>I get the skepticism, but I think you&#8217;re underselling the infrastructure angle a bit. If AI really does become a general-purpose layer like the internet, then countries that wait for perfect consensus may just end up paying rent forever to whoever built first. The real policy question is whether governments can force the profits and the costs to be shared more fairly, not whether the tech exists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: silvyy		</title>
		<link>https://www.economylens.com/tech-bosses-press-g20-to-build-data-centers-but-split-on-risk/#comment-35769</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[silvyy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 21:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.economylens.com/tech-bosses-press-g20-to-build-data-centers-but-split-on-risk/#comment-35769</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nvidia and OpenAI are basically doing the global version of “trust us bro, we need more power plants.” Hard to argue with the infrastructure angle, but these data centers don’t magically appear for free — somebody’s paying for the grid upgrades, cooling, land, and water. If AI is the next industrial layer, fine, but governments should bargain harder instead of just rolling out the red carpet.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nvidia and OpenAI are basically doing the global version of “trust us bro, we need more power plants.” Hard to argue with the infrastructure angle, but these data centers don’t magically appear for free — somebody’s paying for the grid upgrades, cooling, land, and water. If AI is the next industrial layer, fine, but governments should bargain harder instead of just rolling out the red carpet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: source_please		</title>
		<link>https://www.economylens.com/tech-bosses-press-g20-to-build-data-centers-but-split-on-risk/#comment-35770</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[source_please]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 21:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.economylens.com/tech-bosses-press-g20-to-build-data-centers-but-split-on-risk/#comment-35770</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Altman saying AI is non-negotiable sounds a lot like lobbyists in a lab coat trying to pre-book humanity’s future before the public gets a vote. I’m not ضد AI, but the “build first, ask questions later” playbook is how you end up with shiny stranded assets and utility bills that look like a hostage note. The real issue isn’t whether countries use AI, it’s who pockets the profits and who gets stuck holding the electrical bill.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Altman saying AI is non-negotiable sounds a lot like lobbyists in a lab coat trying to pre-book humanity’s future before the public gets a vote. I’m not ضد AI, but the “build first, ask questions later” playbook is how you end up with shiny stranded assets and utility bills that look like a hostage note. The real issue isn’t whether countries use AI, it’s who pockets the profits and who gets stuck holding the electrical bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
