EconomyLens.com
No Result
View All Result
Saturday, November 1, 2025
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Business
  • Markets
  • Tech
  • Editorials
EconomyLens.com
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Business
  • Markets
  • Tech
  • Editorials
No Result
View All Result
EconomyLens.com
No Result
View All Result
Home Other

TikTok battles US ban threat in court

Emma Reilly by Emma Reilly
September 16, 2024
in Other
Reading Time: 8 mins read
A A
0
59
SHARES
737
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Social media app TikTok has come under scrutiny from the US government. ©AFP

Washington (AFP) – TikTok faced pushback in a federal court on Monday in its efforts to stop a law that requires the app to divest from its Chinese ownership or face a ban in the United States. A three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals in Washington heard arguments from TikTok, its owner ByteDance, and a group of users claiming that the ban violates free speech and is unconstitutional. The US government alleges TikTok allows Beijing to collect data and spy on users. It also says TikTok is a conduit to spread propaganda. China and the company strongly deny these claims.

Related

China’s Xi meets South Korean leader, capping APEC summit

Food stamps, the bulwark against hunger for over 40 mn Americans

2,000 trucks stuck in Belarus after Lithuania closes border: association

China’s suspension of rare earth controls applies to EU: official

Stocks extend losses tracking AI, Fed and trade

TikTok has until January to find a buyer or face the ban, which would likely provoke a strong response from the Chinese government and further strain US-China relations. It would also upend the social media business and rile many of the app’s 170 million US users. ByteDance, TikTok’s parent company, has stated it has no plans to sell TikTok, leaving the app’s legal appeal — focused on US guarantees for free speech — as its only option for survival.

“The law before this court is unprecedented. Its effect would be staggering,” said Andrew Pincus, the lawyer arguing on behalf of the wildly popular video-sharing app. “For the first time in history, Congress has expressly targeted a specific US speaker (i.e., TikTok USA),” he added. In their questions, the judges challenged this argument, comparing it to earlier cases in US jurisprudence. This included a case from the 1980s where closing the Palestine Information Office in Washington was deemed legal because it was backed by the PLO, an organization officially designated as a terrorist group.

TikTok’s lawyer countered: “Mere foreign ownership can’t possibly be a justification, because it would turn the First Amendment (protecting free speech) on its head.” He added that seeing foreign ownership alone as criteria for forced divestiture “would be a pretty shocking change here,” citing other foreign-owned media companies such as Politico, Al Jazeera, and the BBC. The lawyer also questioned why the US law did not target e-commerce sites with similar Chinese ownership. Pincus said that if you followed the US government’s logic, which he disagreed with, “certainly those sites could well be susceptible to (China’s) action, but they’ve been excluded by Congress (in the law).”

– ‘Important questions’ –

The judges grilled the US government on whether TikTok USA, a US-based company, should be denied its free speech rights. The US government lawyer, Daniel Tenny, insisted that the content being targeted was a recommendations algorithm based at ByteDance in China, not anything created by US users, and that it was therefore out of reach of free speech considerations. “There’s really no dispute here that the recommendation engine is maintained, developed, and written by ByteDance, rather than TikTok USA, and that is what’s being targeted,” Tenny argued.

The trio of judges will decide the case in the coming weeks or months, but regardless of their decision, the case is likely to reach the US Supreme Court, experts said. “After listening to the oral arguments, I am more convinced that this case will end up in the Supreme Court,” said Sarah Kreps, director of Cornell’s Tech Policy Institute. “Overall, the judges sounded more skeptical of the TikTok case but also raised important questions about the First Amendment, foreign influence and standards of scrutiny that I do not think were clearly resolved with today’s exchanges,” she added.

The fate of Americans’ access to TikTok has become a prominent issue in the country’s political debates, with Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump opposing a ban. Democratic President Joe Biden, whose vice president Kamala Harris is running against Trump, signed the law that gives TikTok until January to shed its Chinese ownership or be expelled from the US market. Harris uses TikTok in her campaign for November’s election and, despite signing the bill that could kill the app, Biden also created an account. According to a survey from Pew Research earlier this month, just 32 percent of US adults back a TikTok ban.

© 2024 AFP

Tags: ChinaFirst AmendmentTikTok
Share24Tweet15Share4Pin5Send
Previous Post

Brazil’s farmers fret over fires and drought

Next Post

Murdoch media empire succession drama plays out in US tribunal

Emma Reilly

Emma Reilly

Related Posts

Other

Asia markets diverge on heels of Apple, Amazon earnings

October 31, 2025
Other

Nvidia to supply 260,000 cutting-edge chips to South Korea

October 31, 2025
Other

Asia markets mostly up on heels of Apple, Amazon earnings

October 30, 2025
Other

Saudi chases AI ambitions with homegrown firm pitched to global investors

October 30, 2025
Other

Stocks diverge as investors digest Trump-Xi talks, earnings

October 30, 2025
Other

UN climate fund posts record year as chief defends loans

October 30, 2025
Next Post

Murdoch media empire succession drama plays out in US tribunal

Intel delays Germany, Poland chip factories for two years

Boeing, union resume talks as strike empties Seattle plants

Climate finance: what you need to know ahead of COP29

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest

New York ruling deals Trump business a major blow

September 30, 2024

Elon Musk’s X fights Australian watchdog over church stabbing posts

April 21, 2024

Women journalists bear the brunt of cyberbullying

April 22, 2024

France probes TotalEnergies over 2021 Mozambique attack

May 6, 2024

New York ruling deals Trump business a major blow

79

Ghanaian finance ministry warns against fallout from anti-LGBTQ law

74

Shady bleaching jabs fuel health fears, scams in W. Africa

71

Stock markets waver, oil prices edge up

65

Canada PM says Xi talks ‘turning point’, apologises to Trump

November 1, 2025

Bangladesh dockers strike over foreign takeover of key port

November 1, 2025

Latin America weathered Trump tariffs better than feared: regional bank chief

November 1, 2025

China’s Xi meets South Korean leader, capping APEC summit

November 1, 2025
EconomyLens Logo

We bring the world economy to you. Get the latest news and insights on the global economy, from trade and finance to technology and innovation.

Pages

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

Categories

  • Business
  • Economy
  • Markets
  • Tech
  • Editorials

Network

  • Coolinarco.com
  • CasualSelf.com
  • Fit.CasualSelf.com
  • Sport.CasualSelf.com
  • SportBeep.com
  • MachinaSphere.com
  • MagnifyPost.com
  • TodayAiNews.com
  • VideosArena.com
© 2025 EconomyLens.com - Top economic news from around the world.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Business
  • Markets
  • Tech
  • Editorials

© 2024 EconomyLens.com - Top economic news from around the world.