**Oakland (United States) (AFP)** – Jury selection kicked off on Wednesday in a California courtroom where Instagram and Facebook owner Meta will defend itself against allegations of harming children in a new trial which experts describe as social media’s big tobacco moment. Federal Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers and lawyers for both sides probed prospective jurors about their views of social media and Meta, asking if they personally had social media accounts, whether their kids use social media, and if they think social media is responsible for mental health, among other questions.
Some said they believed that social media plays a role in mental health, with one person comparing the serotonin boost that some people feel from “doomscrolling” to using cocaine. Eight people were picked Wednesday afternoon to serve on the jury. They will play an advisory role in the trial, with the judge making the final decision. A coalition of states sued Meta in 2023 for allegedly designing addictive features for kids in its apps and violating state laws. Four states were selected to represent their claims: California, Colorado, Kentucky, and New Jersey.
Top prosecutors from those states now aim to prove in federal court that Meta deliberately made Facebook and Instagram addictive for children. Meta “strongly disagrees with these allegations” and is “confident the evidence will show our longstanding commitment to supporting young people,” a spokesperson told AFP, adding that the company has “listened to parents, worked with experts and law enforcement.”
Although it’s not the first lawsuit that seeks to hold a social media company accountable for its impact on mental health and safety, it could become one of the most consequential. “It really feels like tobacco in the 1990s,” Vincent Joralemon, a director at Berkeley’s Life Sciences Law and Policy Center, told AFP. While such cases about social media harms revolve around the intersection of technology and addiction, the legal argument in this case against Meta centers on its business practices, similar to when the federal government sued tobacco companies around three decades ago, Joralemon said.
**- ‘Protecting teens’**
By the early 1990s, decades of research showed that tobacco use caused health problems such as cancer, and eventually additional investigations revealed how the industry deliberately downplayed, and even concealed, the harmful impacts of its products. Dozens of US states sued four major tobacco companies, and by 1998, won a landmark settlement agreement which included financial penalties and changes to how products were marketed, particularly to children whom the industry targeted with advertisements featuring cartoon characters, the most famous of which was known as “Joe Camel.”
Meta was convicted on similar grounds in separate trials held in Los Angeles and New Mexico, with combined damages that approach $1 billion. In Oakland, the states are demanding a long list of changes to Meta’s apps, in addition to financial penalties as high as $1.4 trillion, close to Meta’s entire market value, which hovers around $1.5 trillion. Despite the eye-popping number, money isn’t Meta’s biggest problem, if it were to lose the case. “The huge issue here is reputational harm” and being forced to make major changes, Joralemon said. “Putting a CEO on the witness stand can be quite damning,” as well, he said.
Meta founder and chief Mark Zuckerberg is among the star witnesses expected to testify. The case could be “the beginning of a broader reckoning” for Meta, Nora Freeman Engstrom told AFP via email. She is a law professor and associate dean at Stanford. It will be important to see the “gap” between what Meta knew privately and what it disclosed publicly, Engstrom said. Meta is “confident in our record of protecting teens online and will continue to defend ourselves against claims that misrepresent the facts,” the company told AFP last week.
In May, Snap, TikTok, YouTube, and Meta settled with a school district in Kentucky for $27 million to avoid another trial that was expected to set a precedent for around 1,200 similar lawsuits. On Monday, a federal appeals court ruled that more than 3,000 additional lawsuits filed against Meta, YouTube-parent Google, Snap, and TikTok can proceed.
© 2024 AFP
